Correction: Neural mechanisms of psychedelic visual imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the sentence beginning ‘Connectivity from the EVA follows two broad pathways. The dorsal pathway is connected with the fusiform gyrus (FG), which is part of the inferior temporal cortex that functions to recognise objects and faces [45]. The ventral pathway from the EVA is connected to the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), which, along with the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), is involved in cognitive aspects of imagery.’ the should have read ‘Connectivity from the early visual areas (EVA) follows two broad pathways. The dorsal pathway projects to the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), which plays a role in the cognitive aspects of visual imagery and spatial processing. The ventral pathway connects to the fusiform gyrus (FG), part of the inferior temporal cortex involved in object and face recognition [45]. Both pathways interact with the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which integrates higher cognitive functions like attention and working memory, and can modulate both spatial and object-based visual information.’
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".