MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404601051 · doi:10.1186/s40658-024-00700-9

Impact of cell geometry, cellular uptake region, and tumour morphology on 225Ac and 177Lu dose distributions in prostate cancer

2024· article· en· W4404601051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEJNMMI Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencySpinal Cord Injury BCMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsProstate cancerNucleusLNCaPCytoplasmNuclear medicineCellAbsorbed doseChemistryCancer cellCancer researchPathologyCancerMedicineBiologyCell biologyInternal medicineDosimetryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Radiopharmaceutical therapy with 225 Ac- and 177 Lu-PSMA has shown promising results for the treatment of prostate cancer. However, the distinct physical properties of alpha and beta radiation elicit varying cellular responses, which could be influenced by factors such as tumour morphology. In this study, we use simulations to examine how cell geometry, region of pharmaceutical uptake within the cell to model different internalization fractions, and the presence of tumour hypoxia and necrosis impact nucleus absorbed doses and dose heterogeneity with 225 Ac and 177 Lu. We also develop nucleus absorbed dose kernels for application to autoradiography images. Methods We used the GATE Monte Carlo software to simulate three geometries of LNCaP prostate cancer cells (spherical, cubic, and ovoid) with activity of 225 Ac or 177 Lu internalized in the cytoplasm or bound to the extracellular membrane. Nucleus S-values were calculated for each geometry, source region, and isotope. The cell models were used to create nucleus absorbed dose kernels for each source region describing the dose to each nucleus in a cell layer, which were applied to simulated tumours composed of normoxic, hypoxic, or necrotic cancer cells to obtain dose rate maps. Absorbed doses within the tumours and dose heterogeneity were analyzed for each tumour morphology and isotope. Cell geometry made a minimal impact on S-values to the nucleus, however internalization resulted in higher nucleus doses. Applying the kernels to the simulated tumour maps showed that doses to each cell type varied between 225 Ac and 177 Lu depending on tumour morphology. Dose heterogeneity within tumours was slightly higher with 225 Ac, however the tumour morphology made a larger impact on dose heterogeneity compared to the choice of isotope, with hypoxic and necrotic tumours having very heterogeneous dose distributions. Conclusions Cell geometry simplifications may still allow robust results in simulation studies. Furthermore, the morphology of the tumour itself may make a larger impact on treatment response compared to other variables such as ratio of internalization. Finally, nucleus absorbed dose kernels were created that could enable microdosimetric studies with autoradiography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it