MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Violence in Scotland the British Army and Government After Culloden

2024· book-chapter· en· W4404607041 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murray Pittock

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)CriminologyPolitical scienceHistoryMedical emergencyEngineeringPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter goes beyond the well-rehearsed scholarship concerning atrocities in the wake of the battle. It identifies the global implications of the Forty-Five, noting that men from 18 regiments which had fought one another at Fontenoy were on the field at Culloden, and placing both the Rising and its imperial legacy in the shape of the Acadian deportations in the context of the imperial struggle over Canada. The Army’s desire to implement a Cromwellian “Irish” policy of population transplantation and summary execution was nullified by British political pressure, but the military struggle to control the institutions of Scottish governance and society throughout the whole of the country continued deep into the 1750s, until population transplantation in Canada was accompanied by extensive Scottish recruitment to fight the French there.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207