MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404607487 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.20.624502

Transcriptional landscape of the archaeal cell cycle is broadly conserved in eukaryotes

2024· preprint· en· W4404607487 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel V Gomez-Raya-Vilanova, Jérôme Teulière, Sofia Medvedeva, Eduardo Corel, Philippe Lopez, François‐Joseph Lapointe, Debashish Bhattacharya, Louis‐Patrick Haraoui, Élodie Turc, Marc Monot, Virginija Cvirkaitė‐Krupovič, Éric Bapteste, Mart Krupovìč

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvolutionary biologyBiologyArchaeaComputational biologyCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The cell cycle is a series of events that occur from the moment of cell birth to cell division. In eukaryotes, cell growth, genome replication, genome segregation, and cytokinesis are strictly coordinated, defining discrete cell cycle phases. In contrast, these key processes may occur concurrently in bacteria. Thermoacidophilic archaea in the genus Saccharolobus follow a defined cell cycle program, with the first pre-replicative growth (G1) phase, followed by the chromosome replication (S) phase, the second growth (G2) phase, and rapid genome segregation (M) and cytokinesis (D) phases. However, whether other processes, such as metabolism, catabolism, protein translation, and antiviral defense also occur at specific cell cycle phases, as in eukaryotes, or are active throughout the cell cycle, as in bacteria, remains unclear. To address this question, we synchronized cultures of S. islandicus and performed an in-depth transcriptomic analysis of samples enriched in cells undergoing the M-G1, S, and G2 phases. Differential gene expression and consensus gene co-expression network analyses provided a holistic view of the S. islandicus cell cycle. In addition to the core transcriptome network, which is expressed throughout the cell cycle, we show that diverse metabolic pathways, protein synthesis, cell motility and even antiviral defense systems, are expressed in a cell cycle dependent fashion. Our data also refines understanding of the processes previously known to be linked to the cell cycle, such as DNA replication. We show that most DNA replication genes are expressed prior to the S phase, during the M-G1, whereas expression of the major chromatin genes, and accordingly, chromatinization are concomitant with replication. A statistical model was used to define sets of signature genes characteristic of each of the analyzed cell cycle phases, emphasizing transcriptional stratification of the phases. Signature genes are more conserved across Thermoproteota than non-signature genes and their peak expression, especially for the M-G1 and G2 specific genes, matches that of homologs in yeast. Collectively, our data elucidate the complexity of the S. islandicus cell cycle and suggest that it more closely resembles the cell cycle of eukaryotes than previously appreciated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207