MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404609150 · doi:10.1109/tc.2024.3500369

Mix-GEMM: Extending RISC-V CPUs for Energy-Efficient Mixed-Precision DNN Inference Using Binary Segmentation

2024· article· en· W4404609150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBinary numberParallel computingInferenceSegmentationAlgorithmArithmeticArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficiently computing Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has become a primary challenge in today's computers, especially on devices targeting mobile or edge applications. Recent progress on Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) and Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) has shown that the key to high energy efficiency lies in executing deep learning models with low- (8- to 5-bit) or ultra-low-precision (4- to 2-bit). Unfortunately, current Central Processing Unit (CPU) architectures and Instruction Set Architectures (ISAs) present severe limitations on the range of data sizes supported to compute DNN kernels. In this work, we present <i>Mix-GEMM</i>, a hardware-software co-designed architecture that enables RISC-V processors to efficiently compute arbitrary mixed-precision DNN kernels, supporting all data size combinations from 8- to 2-bit. By applying <i>binary segmentation</i>, our architecture can scale its throughput by decreasing the data size of the operands, resulting in a flexible approach capable of leveraging state-of-the-art QAT and PTQ to achieve high energy efficiency at a very low cost. Evaluating our <i>Mix-GEMM</i> architecture in a dual-issue in-order RISC-V processor shows that we are able to boost its performance and energy efficiency by up to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$44\times$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$11\times$</tex-math></inline-formula> with respect to the baseline processor, with an area overhead of only 2%. This allows our extended processor to execute state-of-the-art DNNs with significantly higher performance and energy efficiency than the standard FP32 precision, while retaining almost the same model accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it