Mix-GEMM: Extending RISC-V CPUs for Energy-Efficient Mixed-Precision DNN Inference Using Binary Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficiently computing Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has become a primary challenge in today's computers, especially on devices targeting mobile or edge applications. Recent progress on Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) and Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) has shown that the key to high energy efficiency lies in executing deep learning models with low- (8- to 5-bit) or ultra-low-precision (4- to 2-bit). Unfortunately, current Central Processing Unit (CPU) architectures and Instruction Set Architectures (ISAs) present severe limitations on the range of data sizes supported to compute DNN kernels. In this work, we presentMix-GEMM, a hardware-software co-designed architecture that enables RISC-V processors to efficiently compute arbitrary mixed-precision DNN kernels, supporting all data size combinations from 8- to 2-bit. By applyingbinary segmentation, our architecture can scale its throughput by decreasing the data size of the operands, resulting in a flexible approach capable of leveraging state-of-the-art QAT and PTQ to achieve high energy efficiency at a very low cost. Evaluating ourMix-GEMMarchitecture in a dual-issue in-order RISC-V processor shows that we are able to boost its performance and energy efficiency by up to$44\times$and$11\times$with respect to the baseline processor, with an area overhead of only 2%. This allows our extended processor to execute state-of-the-art DNNs with significantly higher performance and energy efficiency than the standard FP32 precision, while retaining almost the same model accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".