MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404610080 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452085

Searching for HI around MHONGOOSE galaxies via spectral stacking

2024· article· en· W4404610080 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Veronese, W. J. G. de Blok, J. Healy, D. Kleiner, A. Marasco, F. M. Maccagni, P. Kamphuis, E. Brinks, Benne W. Holwerda, Nikki Zabel, L. Chemin, Elizabeth A. K. Adams, Sushma Kurapati, A. Sorgho, Kristine Spekkens, F. Combes, D. J. Pisano, Fabian Walter, P. Amram, F. Bigiel, O. Ivy Wong, E. Athanassoula

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEuropean Research CouncilFondo Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Científico–TecnológicoAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Research FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyStackingAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The observed star formation rates of galaxies in the Local Universe suggests that they are replenishing their gas reservoir across cosmic time. Cosmological simulations predict that this accretion of fresh gas can occur in a hot or a cold mode, yet the existence of low column density (∼10 17 cm −2 ) neutral atomic hydrogen (H I ) tracing the cold mode has not been unambiguously confirmed by observations. We present the application of unconstrained spectral stacking to attempt to detect the emission from this H I in the circumgalactic medium (CGM) and intergalactic medium (IGM) of six nearby star-forming galaxies from the MHONGOOSE sample for which full-depth observations are available. Our stacking procedure consists of a standard spectral stacking algorithm coupled with a one-dimensional spectral line finder designed to extract a reliable signal close to the noise level. In agreement with previous studies, we find that the amount of signal detected outside the H I disk is much smaller than implied by simulations. Furthermore, the column density limit that we achieve via stacking (∼10 17 cm −2 ) suggests that direct detection of the neutral CGM and IGM component might be challenging in the future, even with the next generation of radio telescopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207