EFECTIW-ROTER: Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Solving Heterogeneous Fleet and Demand Vehicle Routing Problem With Time-Window Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The heterogeneous fleet and demand vehicle routing problem with time-window constraints (HFDVRPTW) is a crucial optimization problem of significant importance in real-world logistics operations. In this paper, we propose a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based method, termed spatial Edge-Feature EnhanCed mulTIgraph fusion encoder With spectral-based embedding and hieRarchical decOder with learnable TEmpoRal positional embedding (EFECTIW-ROTER, pronounced "Effective Router"), to tackle this complex and practical optimization problem. EFECTIW-ROTER utilizes two sparse graphs to represent node connectivity, where nodes correspond to customers and the depot. This sparsity results from the time-window constraints and customers' demand relative to the list of acceptable vehicle attributes specified for service within a heterogeneous fleet, determined by the reachability of the nodes based on these two factors. Leveraging two graph Transformer models, EFECTIW-ROTER's encoding module captures the interactions between the nodes based on these factors. One model encodes customers' heterogeneous demand with spatial edge features based on travel time between the nodes, while the second employs temporal positional embeddings to capture temporal relationships based on time-window ordering. A fusion model is introduced to integrate node interactions based on these graphs. Additionally, a spectral-attention-based pooling ensures effective state representation for the DRL-based method. EFECTIW-ROTER features a hierarchical attention decoder operating in two stages: heterogeneous vehicle selection and node selection. Enhanced with positional embeddings, the decoder is empowered to make effective routing decisions based on time-window constraints' ordering. Experimental results using real-world traffic data from two major Canadian cities confirm EFECTIW-ROTER's better performance over current state-of-the-art DRL-based and heuristic methods. EFECTIW-ROTER reduces travel times while also achieving faster computational times when compared to conventional heuristics. Additional experiments demonstrate its generalizability across larger instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".