Entre a prescrição curricular e as práticas docentes: o currículo de Ciências Humanas da escola do Quebec e o seu ensino no primário
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO Os debates em torno da concepção da disciplina História no Programme de Formation de l’École Québécoise (PFEQ) para o primeiro segmento do ensino fundamental (primaire) começaram muito antes de sua publicação em 2001 (Québec, 2006). Passados 20 anos, o que dizer da relação entre as concepções de história e do pensamento histórico veiculadas no PFEQ e aquelas expressas por professores do primário? Essa é a pergunta que anima nossa reflexão, que oferece uma análise comparativa a partir de fontes de diferentes naturezas. Utilizando-se de dados provenientes de entrevistas semidirigidas realizadas com 13 professores do ensino básico, relativas a uma atividade de ensino-aprendizagem planejada e implementada, este artigo tem como objetivo conhecer a articulação do pensamento histórico mobilizado pelos professores em suas aulas e, em que medida, ela é complementar ou divergente no que diz respeito às concepções de História veiculadas no PFEQ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".