Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article explores the place and framework for a socially transformative Christology, particularly in Africa. More specifically, it calls attention to the importance of grassroots christological imagination in the discussion of the social relevance of faith in Jesus Christ in Africa. The essay begins with highlighting the marginalization of the christological narratives of Christians at the grassroots still present in some of the academic discussions about the meaning and social significance of Christ in African Christianity. It then argues that taking seriously the grassroots Christologies, and a more critical-empathetic engagement of them within the framework of imagination and image, open up an effective way of doing Christology ‘from within’ the proclamation and longing of the People of God, who are graced to become both the embodiment and agents of Christ’s transforming presence and act. To this end, the article attempts to trace something of the mutual illumination connecting Christology and the transformation of society in Africa. And in doing so, it contributes to the task of bridging the gap that often exists between popular and academic Christologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".