MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Unraveling dynamic omnivory and community interactions between primary producers and an apex predator

2024· preprint· en· W4404615763 on OpenAlexaff
Ashlee J. Mikkelsen, Andreas Zedrosser, Agnieszka Sergiel, Keith A. Hobson, Nuria Selva, Anne G. Hertel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredationEcologyBiologyApex predatorHerbivoreOmnivoreUrsusPredatorForagingCarnivorePopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of climate and plant phenological changes on herbivorous species are widely recognized, yet less research has focused on omnivorous and carnivorous species, even though they also have vegetative components to their diet. The historical focus on predators regarding simple interactions between obligate carnivores and their prey over-simplifies many species’ roles within ecological communities by casting them purely as predators and minimizes other, equally important roles within the community. We used a long-term, individual-based data set on a polyphagous mammal, the brown bear (Ursus arctos), to estimate diet over 25 years identify long-term patterns and factors contributing to annual variation in diet. We used carbon and nitrogen stable isotope values measured in hair and Bayesian mixing models to determine annual diet among three demographic bear classes, and then used linear regression models to relate diet to indices of food availability. We found that while diet varied among years and demographic classes, variation in both carbon and nitrogen values were explained by bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) productivity. Additionally, proportions of animal-derived foods decreased through time, while proportions of bilberry increased, even as the moose population in Sweden increased over this same period. While meat and animal-derived foods are considered higher quality foods for bears, bear diet did not respond to changing moose availability. Our results highlight that even though vegetative diet components in predators are typically considered less important to predator ecology, brown bears in Sweden responded to changes in primary production, regardless of prey availability. It will be crucial to put more emphasis on the vegetative parts of diets as we predict how species and ecological communities respond to climate change because predators serve many more functions within their community besides predation alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→