MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404624817 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103499

Investigating bearing and gear vibrations with a Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) and machine learning approach

2024· article· en· W4404624817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity Canada West
FundersUniversity Canada West
KeywordsMicroelectromechanical systemsVibrationBearing (navigation)Mechanical systemMechanical engineeringMechanical vibrationEngineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceAcousticsPhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A MEMS setup comprised of a Raspberry Pi 4B+ module, a NuceloF401RET6 MCU, an OLED screen, and an Adxl1002z accelerometer is developed to acquire vibration data at the desired sampling frequency. • A Random Forest machine learning model is developed to classify the faults and to determine the MEMS performance using extracted vibrational features. • A detailed signal analysis evaluates MEMS performance and investigates the impact of bearing and gear vibration interactions. Bearings and gears are the pivotal components of mechanical systems and are prone to faults that can impact the system's overall performance. These components' condition monitoring and fault diagnosis are vital for maintaining system reliability and efficiency. In this research, a MEMS setup is initially developed, comprising a Raspberry Pi 4B+ CPU module, a NucleoF401RET6 MCU, an OLED screen, and an Adxl1002z accelerometer for acquiring vibration signals at the desired sampling frequency stored in the CPU memory. Further, an RF model is also developed to classify different types of faults based on features extracted from the acquired vibration data. The model evaluates the precision and reliability of the MEMS setup in capturing and classifying vibration signals. A detailed signal analysis is also conducted to determine the performance of the developed MEMS setup and to investigate the effect of bearing vibration signature due to gear fault and vice versa. The results indicate that bearing faults cause irregularities in the shaft's rotational speed, leading to modulation of the gear mesh frequency ( gmf ) of gears mounted on the affected shaft. Conversely, gear faults disrupt the shaft's rotational motion, imposing excessive loads on shaft-supported bearings. These disruptions result in distinct vibration patterns characterised by increased harmonics and side bands within the bearing frequency range. The RF model effectively identifies and classifies faults with high accuracy by leveraging its ability to prioritise the most significant vibrational features, resulting in improved predictive performance and robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it