MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404626755 · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2024.119852

Self-healing kinetics in monolayer graphene following very low energy ion irradiation

2024· article· en· W4404626755 on OpenAlexafffund
Pierre Vinchon, Satoshi Hamaguchi, S. Roorda, F. Schiettekatte, Luc Stafford

Bibliographic record

VenueCarbon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersScience and Engineering Research CouncilFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsGrapheneMonolayerIrradiationKineticsMaterials scienceIonNanotechnologyChemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monolayer graphene subjected to 13 and 90 eV Ar ion irradiation was probed by in-situ Raman spectroscopy. At 90 eV ion irradiation, a simple damage accumulation is seen. However, at 13 eV, immediately after damage formation, significant graphene self-healing is observed in real time. We argue that energy deposition through very-low-energy ion collisions can create vacancies and carbon adatoms which can diffuse easily on the surface and recombine afterward. The self-healing kinetics exhibit a fast (∼10 s) and a slow regime (∼30 min), which cannot result only from adatom-vacancy recombination. Based on a defect kinetic model, self-healing efficiency is revealed to be limited by dimer formation. Yet, the interplay between Stone-Wales defects and adatoms enables progressive release of the latter, and subsequent graphene self-healing on a longer time scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarbonSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207