MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Benchmarking performance: A round-robin testing for liquid alkaline electrolysis

2024· article· en· W4404632463 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon Appelhaus, L. Ritz, Sharon V. Pape, Felix Lohmann‐Richters, Mikkel Rykær Kraglund, Jens Oluf Jensen, Francesco Massari, Mehrdad Boroomandnia, Justin Albers, Clemens Kubeil, Christian Immanuel Bernäcker, Michelle Sophie Lemcke, Nadine Menzel, Guido Bender, Binyu Chen, Steven Holdcroft, Renaud Delmelle, Joris Proost, Jaromír Hnát, Pertti Kauranen, Vesa Ruuskanen, Toni Viinanen, Martin Müller, Thomas Turek, Meital Shviro

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Energy AgencyBundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und TechnologieHydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies OfficeBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsBenchmarkingRound robin testElectrolysisComputer scienceChemistryAlkaline water electrolysisProcess engineeringNuclear chemistryMathematicsBusinessEngineeringStatisticsPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid alkaline water electrolysis has gained considerable interest in recent years due to its promising role in an energy sector based on renewable energy sources. Its main advantage is the low investment cost of industrial alkaline water electrolyzers compared to other electrolysis technologies. A challenge remains in developing cost-efficient materials, stable in corrosive electrolytes, and offering competitive cell performance. Although there are many publications in liquid alkaline electrolysis, there is insufficient standardization of experimental conditions and procedures, reference materials, and hardware. As a result, comparability and reproducibility suffer, significantly slowing down research progress. This manuscript presents the initial efforts towards the development of such reference hardware and procedures within the framework of Task 30 Electrolysis in the Technology Collaboration Programme on Advanced Fuel Cells (AFC TCP) of the International Energy Agency (IEA). For this purpose, a homogenized setup including the electrolysis cell, functional materials, experimental conditions, and a test protocol was developed. The protocol and hardware were tested simultaneously at eleven different institutions in Europe and North America. To evaluate the success of this approach, polarization and run-in data were collected and analyzed for comparison, and performance differences were calculated. Significant disparities between the laboratories were observed and some key influence factors were identified: iron content in the electrolyte resulted to be a main source of deviation between experiments, along with temperature control and the conditioning of the cells. The results suggest that additional attention to detailed experimental conditions should be paid to obtain meaningful performance data in future research. • Alkaline water electrolysis round robin tests were performed at 11 different laboratories. • A harmonized electrolysis cell and testing protocol was developed. • Significant inter-laboratory deviations were observed, up to 610 mV at 1000 mA cm −2 . • Iron content in electrolyte and temperature control are key improvement parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hydrogen EnergySame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207