The use of generative adversarial network as a domain adaptation method for cross-corpus speech emotion recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research of speech emotion recognition (SER) is growing rapidly. However, SER still faces a cross-corpus SER problem which is performance degradation when a single SER model is tested in different domains. This study shows the impact of implementing a generative adversarial network (GAN) model for adapting speech data from different domains and performs emotion classification from the speech features using a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The results of this study found that the domain adaptation approach using a GAN model could improve the accuracy of emotion classification in speech data from 2 different domain such as the ryerson audio-visual database of emotional speech and song (RAVDESS) speech corpus and the EMO-DB speech corpus ranging from 10.88% to 28.77%, with the highest average performance increase across three different class balancing method reaching 18.433%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it