MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404636496 · doi:10.61838/kman.hn.2.1.16

Effectiveness of Cognitive-Analytical Therapy on Alexithymia and Interpersonal Problems in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia

2024· article· en· W4404636496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Nexus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaCronbach's alphaClinical psychologyInterpersonal communicationCognitionInterpersonal psychotherapyGroup psychotherapyPopulationCognitive therapyPsychological interventionPsychologyIntervention (counseling)PsychotherapistMedicineRandomized controlled trialPsychiatryPsychometricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive-Analytical Therapy (CAT) appears to be a suitable approach for intervening in the improvement of interpersonal problems in individuals with psychosomatic disorders. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Cognitive-Analytical Therapy on alexithymia and interpersonal problems in patients with functional dyspepsia. The present study employed a quasi-experimental method with a pretest, posttest, and follow-up design, along with a control group. The statistical population consisted of patients with functional dyspepsia who visited the gastroenterology clinic of Shariati Hospital in Tehran in 2021, from which 30 eligible volunteers were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups: the "Cognitive-Analytical Therapy" group and a control group. Research tools included a demographic questionnaire, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32. The content validity of the tools was measured qualitatively, and their reliability was assessed using internal consistency by calculating Cronbach’s alpha. After conducting 16 therapeutic sessions for the intervention group, the data were collected and analyzed using SPSS software version 26. In the present study, there was a significant difference between the pretest, posttest, and follow-up scores for both variables (P = .001). There was also a significant difference between the intervention and control groups for both alexithymia (P = .001, F = 69.938) and interpersonal problems (P = .001, F = 70.598). The results indicated that Cognitive-Analytical Therapy is effective in reducing alexithymia and interpersonal problems in patients with functional dyspepsia. It is recommended that, in addition to medical treatments, psychotherapy interventions such as "Cognitive-Analytical Therapy" be provided for patients with functional dyspepsia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it