MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404636926 · doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000861.v3

Identification of Mammaliicoccus fleurettii as the source of a methicillin-resistant gene in a First Nation reserve lake in Manitoba, Canada

2024· article· en· W4404636926 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sabrin Bashar, Rakesh Patidar, Alvan Wai, Dawn White, George R. Golding, Annemieke Farenhorst, Ayush Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueAccess Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIdentification (biology)GeographyNature reserveEcologyArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our study aimed to identify the bacterial source of a previously detected mobile antibiotic-resistant gene, mecA , found in a lake that serves as a source to a water treatment plant operated by a First Nation reserve. Three methicillin-resistant presumptive Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the sample using selective media were verified as mecA positive by PCR. MALDI-TOF and whole-genome sequencing of each isolate confirmed that all three were Mammaliicoccus fleurettii . Antibiotic-resistant gene analysis of the assembled genomes predicted mecA with 99.7% sequence identity, and phylogenetic analysis grouped our three mecA genes with the mecA allele from a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus . Identifying microbial species known to harbour mobile antibiotic-resistant elements can provide greater depth of information about drinking water, an especially essential need in First Nation reserves where water quality too frequently is poor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccess MicrobiologySame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207