MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404637222 · doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2024.09.008

Rational configuration problems and a family of curves

2024· article· en· W4404637222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Number Theory · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given , we consider the number of rational points on the genus one curve H η : y 2 = ( a ( 1 − x 2 ) + b ( 2 x ) ) 2 + ( c ( 1 − x 2 ) + d ( 2 x ) ) 2 . We prove that the set of η for which H η ( Q ) ≠ ∅ has density zero, and that if a rational point ( x 0 , y 0 ) ∈ H η ( Q ) exists, then H η ( Q ) is infinite unless a certain explicit polynomial in a , b , c , d , x 0 , y 0 vanishes. Curves of the form H η naturally occur in the study of configurations of points in R n with rational distances between them. As one example demonstrating this framework, we prove that if a line through the origin in R 2 passes through a rational point on the unit circle, then it contains a dense set of points P such that the distances from P to each of the three points ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 ) , and ( 1 , 1 ) are all rational. We also prove some results regarding whether a rational number can be expressed as a sum or product of slopes of rational right triangles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it