MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404637871 · doi:10.1128/mbio.02419-24

The <i>Vibrio</i> type VI secretion system induces intestinal macrophage redistribution and enhanced intestinal motility

2024· article· en· W4404637871 on OpenAlexaff
Julia S. Ngo, Piyush Amitabh, Jonah G. Sokoloff, Calvin Trinh, Travis J. Wiles, Karen Guillemin, R. Parthasarathy

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesUniversity of OregonNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVibrio choleraeBiologySecretionImmune systemZebrafishMotilityCell biologyMicrobiologyVibrioPathogenCrosstalkBacteriaImmunologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Intestinal microbes, whether resident or transient, influence the physiology of their hosts, altering both the chemical and the physical characteristics of the gut. An example of the latter is the human pathogen Vibrio cholerae’s ability to induce strong mechanical contractions, discovered in zebrafish. The underlying mechanism has remained unknown, but the phenomenon requires the actin crosslinking domain (ACD) of Vibrio ’s type VI secretion system (T6SS), a multicomponent protein syringe that pierces adjacent cells and delivers toxins. By using a zebrafish-native Vibrio and imaging-based assays of host intestinal mechanics and immune responses, we find evidence that macrophages mediate the connection between the T6SS ACD and intestinal activity. Inoculation with Vibrio gives rise to strong, ACD-dependent, gut contractions whose magnitude resembles those resulting from genetic depletion of macrophages. Vibrio also induces tissue damage and macrophage activation, both ACD-dependent, recruiting macrophages to the site of tissue damage and away from their unperturbed positions near enteric neurons that line the midgut and regulate intestinal motility. Given known crosstalk between macrophages and enteric neurons, our observations suggest that macrophage redistribution forms a key link between Vibrio activity and intestinal motility. In addition to illuminating host-directed actions of the widespread T6SS protein apparatus, our findings highlight how localized bacteria-induced injury can reshape neuro-immune cellular dynamics to impact whole-organ physiology. IMPORTANCE Gut microbes, whether beneficial, harmful, or neutral, can have dramatic effects on host activities. The human pathogen Vibrio cholerae can induce strong intestinal contractions, though how this is achieved has remained a mystery. Using a zebrafish-native Vibrio and live imaging of larval fish, we find evidence that immune cells mediate the connection between bacteria and host mechanics. A piece of Vibrio ’s type VI secretion system, a syringe-like apparatus that stabs cellular targets, induces localized tissue damage, activating macrophages and drawing them from their normal residence near neurons, whose stimulation of gut contractions they dampen, to the damage site. Our observations reveal a mechanism in which cellular rearrangements, rather than bespoke biochemical signaling, drives a dynamic neuro-immune response to bacterial activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207