Dispersion of Activation in Single‐Beat Global Maps During Programmed Ventricular Stimulation Identifies Infarct‐Related Ventricular Tachycardia Isthmus Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electrophysiological characterization of ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus sites is complex and time-consuming. We aimed at developing and validating a global mapping strategy during programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) to reveal the underlying electrophysiological properties of the infarct-related substrate and to enable identification of highly heterogeneous activation sites associated with protected VT isthmus sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Experimental study that included 22 pigs with established myocardial infarction undergoing in vivo characterization of the anatomical and functional myocardial substrate associated with potential arrhythmogenicity. High-density sequential activation maps during ventricular pacing and VT were compared with single-beat maps using a 64-pole basket catheter positioned in the left ventricle. Further analyses were performed using a novel local activation time-dispersion score to identify regional activation time heterogeneities on both baseline drive pacing and each of the extrastimuli of the PVS protocol. Basket catheter splines covered a median of 81.2% of the endocardial surface of the left ventricle. Basket-catheter-derived single-beat activation maps (N=16) during pacing showed a linear relationship with high-density sequential activation maps. Induction of ventricular arrhythmias was associated with higher local activation time-dispersion score values on single-beat global maps during PVS (N=6, 46 arrhythmia induction attempts). Single-beat-derived local activation time-dispersion score maps during successive coupled extrastimuli of the PVS showed a progressive increase in the predictive performance to identify monomorphic VT isthmus sites within the scar region (area under the curve = 0.779 in S2, area under the curve = 0.859 in S4; N=7). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-four-pole-derived single-beat local activation time-dispersion score global maps during PVS identify infarct-related endocardial regions with highly heterogeneous activation times that are associated with protected VT isthmus sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".