MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimization of tethered artificial gravity assists for capture about binary asteroids in the circular restricted three-body problem

2024· article· en· W4404643529 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole A. Pallotta, Michael C.F. Bazzocchi

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Astronautica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNew York Space Grant ConsortiumNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsAsteroidBinary numberComputer scienceGeologyPhysicsMathematicsAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of tethered artificial gravity assists in space travel to perform orbital maneuvers has the potential to significantly extend missions through the reduction of fuel consumption. As space exploration in the solar system has become more accessible, interest in near-Earth asteroid (NEA) missions has grown. Studying NEAs can yield new information about the early solar system as well as provide important insights into related fields, such as planetary defense. Further, it has been discovered that many NEAs are in binary systems, which presents a unique orbital environment for optimizing spacecraft maneuvers for future asteroid missions. This paper develops an approach employing a genetic algorithm to determine optimal tethered maneuvers to periodic orbits in the vicinity of a binary asteroid using circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP) dynamics. The optimization identifies the maneuver that results in the greatest change in the Jacobi constant values between the incoming orbit and final desired orbit. This maximizes the benefit of the tethered artificial gravity assist into a periodic orbit about the primary asteroid. The tethered gravity assists are examined for binary asteroid systems with various mass ratios using CR3BP dynamics. This investigation selected three observed binary asteroid systems with orbital eccentricities that allow for modeling using the CR3BP. Optimizations were performed and simulated for the three systems with different mass ratios to investigate and demonstrate the viability of tethered gravity assists in various binary asteroid environments. • Optimized tethered artificial gravity assist maneuvers in binary asteroid systems. • Circular restricted three-body problem modeled for binary asteroid systems. • Tether maneuver parameters determined that maximize the change in Jacobi constant. • Spacecraft were captured into planar periodic orbits within binary asteroid systems. • Analyzed maneuvers in three binary asteroid systems with different mass ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa AstronauticaSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207