MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404644187 · doi:10.1029/2024gl110588

Exploring Thermospheric Disturbance Patterns Through Space‐Borne Accelerometer Measurement Errors: A Weighted Accelerometer 1B Dataset of GRACE C

2024· article· en· W4404644187 on OpenAlexafffund
Myrto Tzamali, Spiros Pagiatakis

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAccelerometerDisturbance (geology)Remote sensingEnvironmental scienceSpace (punctuation)GeodesyThermosphereObservational errorMeteorologyComputer scienceAtmospheric sciencesGeologyMathematicsStatisticsGeophysicsIonospherePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Satellite measurements are essential for understanding Earth's complex system, yet they often lack a reliable a‐priori covariance matrix. This study presents a new methodology to enhance the reliability of satellite measurements by deriving experimental covariance matrices from the original observation. We focus on the accelerometer measurements (1A dataset) from the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) C satellite. Using autocorrelation analysis, we create a block‐diagonal covariance matrix for the 1A dataset. We then apply a low‐pass Gaussian filter that integrates this covariance matrix into the least squares estimation, resulting in a refined 1B dataset that minimizes spikes and spurious accelerations while preserving measurement error. Our variance analysis uncovers disturbances linked to geomagnetic storms and the satellite's transitions through Earth's shadow and terminator, with fluctuations notably peaking during the equinoxes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.238
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207