MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404645163 · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.102067

Identification of robust catchment classification methods for Sahelian watersheds

2024· article· en· W4404645163 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedram Darbandsari, Paulin Coulibaly, Jafet Andersson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology Regional Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUnited Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and HealthMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeographyIdentification (biology)Drainage basinWatershedCartographyForestryEcologyBiologyComputer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study was conducted in a Sahelian watershed located in Burkina Faso (West Africa). In this study, an inter-comparison procedure is proposed to investigate the effects of implementing various sets of explanatory variables and clustering algorithms on developing hydrologically homogenous regions. Six different sets of explanatory variables considered in this framework are generated using the combinations of topographic, land-use, climatic, and hydrological attributes. Also, seven different linear and nonlinear clustering techniques are implemented using the combinations of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Non-linear Principal Component Analysis (NLPCA), Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), and K-means algorithm. The mean and maximum annual runoff are considered as two variables of interest for conducting a comparison and identifying the most robust classification methods. The study results indicate that the monthly Bagnouls-Gaussen index (BGI) is the most robust set of explanatory variables to be used for identifying the hydrologically homogenous regions considering both mean and maximum annual runoff. Additionally, compared with BGI, the combination of topographic and land-use attributes can provide competitive results while the land-use attributes alone cannot capture the hydrological heterogeneity of the catchments. Moreover, interestingly, the comparison results show that regardless of its simplicity, the K-means algorithm is superior to the other clustering techniques in terms of generating hydrologically homogenous regions based on the monthly BGI. • Implemented catchment classification intercomparison framework. • Thoroughly examined various sets of explanatory variables and clustering methods. • Consider the effects of the number of clusters in the inter-comparison process. • The Monthly Bagnouls-Gaussen Index excels in classifying Sahelian watershed regions. • K-means outperforms in finding homogeneous regions using Bagnouls-Gaussen Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrology Regional StudiesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207