Advanced security framework for low Earth orbit satellites in space information network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites have emerged as key players in space information network (SIN) due to their ability to provide global coverage. However, they remain susceptible to threats such as denial of service (DoS), man-in-the-middle (MITM), and spoofing attacks. In this paper, we propose a cross-layer security framework (CLSF) to address these vulnerabilities. Our approach begins by employing a physically unclonable function (PUF) at the upper layer to establish mutual authentication between legitimate satellites and ground stations, while also securely exchanging frequency seeds for the next phase. Following this, dynamic seed frequency hopping (DSFH) is applied at the physical layer to counter DoS, MITM, and spoofing attacks. Additionally, the frequency transitions of malicious satellites are modeled using a Markov chain. Our results demonstrate that the proposed CLSF, which integrates PUF and DSFH, delivers strong security performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".