Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a new approach for estimating core inflation indicators based on common factors across a broad range of price indices. Specifically, by utilizing procedures for detecting multiple regimes in high-dimensional factor models, we propose two types of core inflation indicators: one incorporating multiple structural breaks and another based on Markov switching. The structural breaks approach can eliminate revisions for past regimes, though it functions as an offline indicator, as real-time detection of breaks is not feasible with this method. On the other hand, the Markov switching approach can reduce revisions while being useful in real time, making it a simple and robust core inflation indicator suitable for real-time monitoring and as a short-term guide for monetary policy. Additionally, this approach allows us to estimate the probability of being in different inflationary regimes. To demonstrate the effectiveness of these indicators, we apply them to Canadian price data. To compare the real-time performance of the Markov switching approach to the benchmark model without regime-switching, we assess their abilities to forecast headline inflation and minimize revisions. We find that the Markov switching model delivers superior predictive accuracy and significantly reduces revisions during periods of substantial inflation changes. Hence, our findings suggest that accounting for time-varying factors and parameters enhances inflation signal accuracy and reduces data requirements, especially following sudden economic shifts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".