Experience of care and health perception among youth who received services within Aire ouverte, a new Integrated Youth Services Network: a Photovoice approach.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: Aire ouverte, an integrated services initiative for youth aged 12–25, is under development in the province of Quebec, Canada. This study’s aim is to explore youth’s perspective regarding their experience within an Aire ouverte located in a remote and rural region of the province, their understanding of health, and how they engaged in a Photovoice process. Methods: We conducted interviews combined with a Photovoice approach. Participants (n=6) were instructed to document their experience within the Aire ouverte services, their understanding of health and how they engaged in a Photovoice process by taking pictures over a 2-month period and selecting a maximum of five for a final individual interview. Transcripts were analyzed to identify recurring themes using an inductive approach. Results: Youth considered Aire ouverte as an effective means to rapidly access healthcare. They highlighted the welcoming facilities and staff attitudes as a key component of their experience. Youth were satisfied with their experience. For them, health requires maintaining a balance, as it is fragile, requires maintaining balance within psychological, physical, social and environmental aspects of their lives. Finally, youth described the Photovoice process as a fun and creative way to express themselves and share their story. Participants also noted the empowering nature of the Photovoice process and experienced positive emotions. Conclusions: This study highlights that the services provided at Aire ouverte are consistent with the principles of youth-friendliness within integrated care. Further studies should be able to capture holistic views of health and youth’s experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".