Female EFL Learners at the College of Basic Education: Attitudes and Experiences with Autonomous Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of autonomous learning on female students' motivation in EFL classrooms at the College of Basic Education (CBE), which falls under the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET) in Kuwait. Specifically, the research examines whether allowing students to control their learning choices enhances their interest and participation in class. A total of 176 female students from the CBE participated in this study. A limitation of this study is that it was conducted exclusively on female students. Data was collected through pre-course and post-course questionnaires focusing on students' preferences, experiences, and topic selection in reading comprehension. The findings revealed that 90% of students preferred choosing their lessons, 98% enjoyed selecting their reading materials, and 92% felt more in control of their learning process. The results highlight the significance of providing relatable and engaging reading comprehension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it