MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404672221 · doi:10.33683/ddm.24.16.3

Insegnare matematica come narrazione

2024· article· it· W4404672221 on OpenAlexaff
Rina Zazkis, Peter Liljedahl

Bibliographic record

VenueDidattica della matematica Dalla ricerca alle pratiche d’aula · 2024
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In questo articolo viene presentata una selezione di tre capitoli del libro Teaching Mathematics as Storytelling, di Rina Zazkis e Peter Liljedahl (2009), nei quali si mette in evidenza che l’avvicinamento a concetti ardui della matematica con la mediazione delle storie consente un coinvolgimento attivo degli studenti nella costruzione di significati matematici e ne favorisce la comprensione profonda. Gli autori forniscono anche interessanti e molteplici esempi di come rimodulare storie già note, facendo sì che semplici problemi testuali presenti sui libri scolastici, diventino accattivanti spunti di narrazione e attività d’aula. Questo abstract, l’introduzione ai tre capitoli e la loro traduzione sono a cura di Angela Donatiello.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDidattica della matematica Dalla ricerca alle pratiche d’aulaSame topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207