Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aspiration pneumonia is a pathology resulting from the inhalation of liquid or solid contents via the airways, which leads to inflammation in the lung parenchyma. The course of the disease varies according to the amount and type of material aspirated, as well as the animal's general state of health. The symptoms of the disease are usually acute and severe. In this sense, the drug therapy chosen for treatment depends on the degree to which the lung is compromised and the clinical signs. The surgical procedure of total or partial lobectomy can be advantageous when the lung lesions are irreversible and clinical therapy has been unsuccessful. The aim of this paper is to report the case of aspiration pneumonia in a female Labrador retriever who presented pulmonary crackles after drowning and was given a pulmonary lobectomy. Computed tomography was used to confirm the diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. This highlights the importance of carrying out complementary tests in order to offer the animal a better therapeutic approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it