MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404679050 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c03320

Petrographic and Molecular Characterization of Organic-Rich Mudstones with Petroleum Generative Potential from The Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Western Canada

2024· article· en· W4404679050 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Daniela Becerra, L D Stasiuk, Christopher R. Clarkson, Humberto Carvajal‐Ortiz, Amin Ghanizadeh, Thomas F. Moslow

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaceralKerogenGeologyInertinitePetrographyLiptiniteSiltstoneFaciesGeochemistryOrganic matterVitriniteSource rockPaleontologySedimentary rockChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Triassic Montney Formation hosts major oil and gas resources in Western Canada. Despite significant historical development of these resources, the origin of its hydrocarbons remains unclear, partly due to limited evidence of primary organic matter within the formation. Most of the hydrocarbons in the Triassic Montney Formation are trapped in low-permeability siltstone facies. For the purposes of this study, however, we investigated the lesser-known and understudied organic- and clay-rich mudstone beds, typically ranging from 2 to 8 cm in thickness, which are interbedded with the siltstone reservoir facies. Petrographic and organic geochemical analyses were conducted on core samples from a well located in west-central Alberta with thermal maturity of 0.95-1.16%Ro. Petrographic analysis, including kerogen maceral composition and fluorescence of petroleum fluid inclusions, reveals that the organic matter in the Montney Formation is closely linked to its host lithology. Organic-rich mudstone facies, with TOC values up to 3.5 wt %, contain primary kerogen (32-74 vol %) and solid bitumen (29-68 vol %). In contrast, the more organic-lean siltstone facies (TOC < 0.8 wt %) contain primarily pore-filling solid bitumen and lack structured kerogen. Kerogen within the organic-rich mudstone facies is mainly composed of liptinite macerals, including amorphinite, liptodetrinite, and alginite, subordinate amounts of acritarch and sporinite, and traces of inertinite and vitrinite macerals. The primary organic matter in the mudstone facies is presumed to be derived from marine sources (i.e., phytoplanktonic algae and bacterial biomass). Its preservation may result from the balance between periodic high productivity (potentially driven by river floods), rapid sedimentation to bury and preserve organic matter, and low dilution by siliciclastic material. Organic petrology analysis suggests an in situ generation of hydrocarbons in the mudstone beds and a potential subsequent short-distance migration to adjacent siltstone beds. Biomarker analysis supports the genetic linkage between rock extracts from these beds. Additionally, three families of petroleum fluid inclusions were systematically observed (using fluorescence microscopy) in several sets of contiguous siltstone and mudstone beds. These findings suggest that the organic-rich mudstone facies partially contributed to the present-day hydrocarbons of the Middle Montney Member in the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207