The Effects of Bedrock Topography and Soil Permeability on Saturated Zone Distribution in a Mountainous Steep‐Slope Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Saturation development and distribution at the soil–bedrock interface are important for predicting shallow landslide occurrence. Previous studies have indicated that saturation is generated in bedrock depressions and valleys and that bedrock groundwater seepage generates locally saturated areas. However, the effects of soil permeability, which is known to be heterogeneously distributed, on saturation development and distribution are poorly understood. In this study, we performed unprecedented high‐resolution (approximately 50 cm grid) soil pore water pressure and soil temperature monitoring using 141 tensiometer–thermocouple sets in a plot measuring approximately 5 × 4 m to investigate the effects of topography and bedrock groundwater seepage on saturation development and distribution. We then measured permeability distribution of two soil profiles, including at the soil–bedrock interface, using the Guelph Permeameter method (GP method) for comparison with saturated zone distribution and saturation duration. The results indicated that a perennial saturated area was formed by bedrock groundwater seepage and was distributed downstream from a certain bedrock surface altitude in the lower region of the study plot. After a peak of rainfall, the perennial saturated area expanded upslope owing to the increased seepage. In areas without the influence of bedrock groundwater, saturation was observed to retreat rapidly at high permeability points and persist over long periods at low permeability points; however, the saturation duration was inconsistent with the bedrock surface topography. Therefore, it is suggested that the bedrock altitude controls the saturation distribution generated by bedrock groundwater, whereas the distribution of saturation that is associated with direct rainwater infiltration may be controlled by the permeability distribution during recession periods. Although the plot size was small, the unprecedented high‐resolution observations suggest that the permeability distribution, rather than the bedrock topography, may control the saturated zone distribution following rainfall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".