MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404688017 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2024.3505270

A 2-D Parameter-Optimized Spatial Finite-Difference Temporal Differential Method With Dispersion-Controllable Properties

2024· article· en· W4404688017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDispersion (optics)Finite difference methodFinite differenceDifferential (mechanical device)Mathematical analysisMathematicsApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)PhysicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, a 2-D parameter-optimized spatial finite-difference temporal differential (SFDTD) method is presented, referred to as the PO-SFDTD method. First, the dispersion characteristic of the conventional SFDTD method is demonstrated. To improve dispersion performance, we incorporate a weight parameter and utilize the central-difference approximation with four stencils for spatial discretization. Then, we develop a dispersion-controllable 2-D PO-SFDTD method. Numerical experiments validate that the proposed method can significantly reduce dispersion errors and optimize numerical dispersion according to specific requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it