MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Vessel Optimal Trajectory and Path Adaptation for Reducing Noise at Cetacean Location Under Velocity Constraints

2024· article· en· W4404688507 on OpenAlexaff
Martin J.-D. Otis, Salick Diagne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectoryNoise (video)Path (computing)Computer scienceAdaptation (eye)Control theory (sociology)AcousticsPhysicsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ahstract- This study suggests to improve the vessel noise impact near cetacean. An automatic path planning and indirect vessel velocity adaptation (using propeller revolution per minute) is suggested in order to reduce the noise. A set of layers (labelled as costmap) is suggested, each layer representing a map of the risk, in order to reduce the risk and estimate the optimal path under constraints (minimum travelled distance versus maximum cetacean distance). For adapting the path, one static costmap is used to describe the shores and islands. Inflation layer is used for safety and a conflict costmap is used to represent the cetacean potential locations. Artificial Potential Field is applied on the combined costmaps (master costmap) and then two different path planning algorithms are applied and compared. Over the preferred path, a dynamic simulation including autopilot to follow waypoints from the path planner, noise synthesis and velocity adaptation is detailed. This navigation aid system suggests to the pilot new adapted path and vessel velocity considering environmental constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→