MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Sailboat with Optimization of Sail Angle

2024· article· en· W4404688835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear modelComputer scienceTrajectoryNonlinear dynamical systemsControl (management)PhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies trajectory tracking control problems of sailing vessels using a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) approach with a novel sail angle optimization approach. The proposed sail angle optimization method accounts for physical constraints during practical implementation such as operational sail angle bound and rate of change in sail angles. This technique also emphasizes the potential to use the sail to plan a safe trajectory, while a simple proportional-derivative (PD) controller is used for rudder angle regulation. The NMPC is implemented for trajectory tracking control in the simulation. Results show that the proposed controller can achieve excellent tracking performance in the presence of environmental disturbances in terms of ocean waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace Engineering and Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207