MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Arctic Surface Ships with DeepPAM

2024· article· en· W4404688872 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica M. Topple, Dugald Thomson, Jeffrey R. Bates, Jinshan Xu, Aaron Webstey, Carolyn M. Binder

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaBedford Institute of OceanographyDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringOceanographyRemote sensingGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As new remote underwater acoustic sensor suites are installed and begin streaming unprecedented volumes of data, automated analysis becomes increasingly important. Automated passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) for contacts of interest such as surface ships or marine mammals is desirable. To this end, we are developing DeepPAM, a deep learning based passive acoustic monitoring system that can detect and classify multiple simultaneous surface ships in passive acoustic data collected in Barrow Strait in the Canadian Arctic. Herein, we present early results of DeepPAM trained and tested to detect and classify 20 unique vessels in data from the Northern Watch seabed arrays. The effects of varying spectral input data pre-processing on performance is explored, followed by preliminary applications of DeepPAM to data from the Barrow Strait Real Time Observatory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207