MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ocean Wave Characterization with UAS Range-Only Measurements

2024· article· en· W4404688910 on OpenAlexafffund
Mae Seto, Robert Bauer, J. B. Clark, Derek Puzzuoli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)Characterization (materials science)Remote sensingEnvironmental scienceWind waveComputer scienceGeologyAerospace engineeringPhysicsOpticsEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean wave characterization is often performed using wave buoy measurements, and these wave characteristics are used to inform marine operations; however, wave buoy or radar measurements in a desired area are not always available. In this work, an uncrewed aerial system (UAS), integrated with two range sensors, is used to estimate wave characteristics of a local wave environment. Knowledge of sea level, the UAS pose, and the measurement from each range sensor are used to characterize the dominant wave period, significant wave height, mean wave height, top-tenth wave height, and wave direction. The discrete Fourier transform (DFT) is applied to wave height measurements from the range sensors to determine the dominant wave period and mean wave heights. The direction of wave propagation is found through a novel method of correlating range sensor measurements and analyzing the wave periods encountered by the UAS. For the simulations in this research, the sea state can be successfully characterized, and the wave propagation direction determined, from the sensor measurements in both sea states 3 and 5 conditions. Future work will focus on in-water verification of these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→