MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Planetary Technologies' Groundbreaking Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal (mCDR) Project in Halifax, and the Emergence of Halifax as a Global mCDR Hub

2024· article· en· W4404689405 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Will Burt, Stephen A. Rackley, Robert Izett, Jason Vallis, Omar Sadoon, Greg H. Rau, Mariam Melashvili, Tim Cross

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon dioxideOceanographyEnvironmental scienceCarbon capture and storage (timeline)AstrobiologyClimate changeGeologyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) is a marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) pathway that is widely accepted to be both permanent in its CO2 storage and, potentially, the most scalable pathway available today. Here, we outline the science behind OAE, and provide details of the past and present advances in the science, engineering, and community building at a worlds-first OAE field trial site in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The site is operated by Halifax-based Planetary Technologies, and the R&D work is conducted alongside numerous local and international collaborators spanning academia, philanthropic organizations, and engineering firms. While the fundamental science is relatively straightforward, the practical deployment of Planetary's end-to-end OAE process is complex and interdisciplinary, and includes the following elements: site scoping and development, the engineered mechanism of adding alkaline materials to the ocean, and the eventual generation of high-quality carbon credits. Workstreams include permitting and regulatory compliance, meaningful community engagement and governance, established protocols to ensure operational, environmental, and social safety, oceanographic sensing using traditional boat-based and novel autonomous platforms, spatiotemporal ocean modelling at scales spanning multiple orders of magnitude, and techniques for both quantifying uncertainties and applying those uncertainties to ensure high-confidence and thus high-quality credits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→