MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404694400 · doi:10.2166/washdev.2024.250

Development of an accessible analytical model for small-volume feces composting

2024· article· en· W4404694400 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Cotera Rivera, Amy M. Bilton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompostSawdustContainer (type theory)Work (physics)Volume (thermodynamics)Environmental scienceProcess (computing)Waste managementSanitationScale (ratio)Environmental engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPulp and paper industryMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Developing small-volume composting systems can help improve sustainable sanitation and waste management at a household scale in constrained environments. In this work, an accessible analytical model that describes the container-based composting process is presented. The model focuses on the compost temperature as the main process parameter and was validated with an initial experiment and then used as a simulation tool for scaling a compost reactor with a mixture of feces and sawdust commonly found in dry toilets. Following literature thresholds for pathogen inactivation, the compost in the second experiment surpassed the required temperatures of 55 °C for more than 3 days. This work demonstrates that pathogen-inactivation temperatures can be achieved for a self-heating, container-based compost system at a household scale with a minimal experimental setup. Furthermore, the process can be described with an accessible analytical model that ensures ease of replication even in constrained environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for DevelopmentSame topicComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesFrench-language works237,207