MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404694762 · doi:10.1190/geo2024-0148.1

Unsupervised ground-roll attenuation via implicit neural representations

2024· article· en· W4404694762 on OpenAlexaff
Ji Li, Dawei Liu, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationComputer scienceGeologyArtificial intelligencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Coherent noise attenuation in land seismic data is particularly challenging, especially when dealing with ground roll. Unlike incoherent noise, ground roll overlaps with reflections in time-space and frequency-wavenumber domains, making it difficult to separate them without distorting the signal. Traditional attenuation methods often struggle with this overlap, leading to a trade-off between preserving the reflections and effectively reducing noise. Recent advances in deep learning offer promising alternatives, but many rely on supervised learning, which requires a substantial amount of paired training data, which is often unavailable in real-world scenarios. Unsupervised approaches, although avoiding the need for labeled data, frequently face issues such as convergence instability and extensive parameter tuning. We develop an unsupervised deep-learning framework for separating reflections from ground roll to address these challenges. Our method leverages the inherent low-frequency bias of implicit neural representations, which emphasizes self-similarity features during training. The network initially learns to represent smoother, flattened events in seismic data before focusing on features with deeper dips and incoherent noise. To enhance the network’s ability to capture the self-similarity of reflections, we apply a normal moveout (NMO) correction to flatten the reflections before using the network to extract these features from the NMO-corrected data. We further incorporate a horizontal derivative regularization term into the loss function. This term penalizes horizontal variations, ensuring a more stable convergence and reducing the burden of parameter tuning, thereby eliminating the need for early stopping. Our approach is validated with synthetic and real land data examples and compared against traditional f-k filtering methods. The results demonstrate its power in effectively attenuating noise while preserving the integrity of seismic reflections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207