MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404709212

Integração ensino, pesquisa e serviços em saúde: antecedentes, estratégias e iniciativas Integration research, education and health services: background, strategies and initiatives

2013· article· pt· W4404709212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Ecilda Lima Ellery, Maria Lúcia Magalhães Bosi, Francisco Antônio Loiola

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPolitical scienceMedical educationBusinessMedicinePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo objetiva identificar e analisar experiên-cias nacionais e internacionais que postulem a integração ensino, pesquisa e serviços de saúde. A partir da vivência no Sistema Municipal de Saúde Escola de Fortaleza, que busca a referida integração, interessava-nos conhecer outras experiências que postulassem a mesma. Nesse sentido, mediante uma revisão da literatura científica em bases bibliográficas on-line, associada à pesquisa documental de experiências contemplando essa integração, identificamos informações caracterizadas pela aproximação entre ensino, pesquisa e serviços de saúde. Foram selecionadas oito experiências no continente americano, sendo uma canadense; uma cubana; duas latino-americanas e quatro brasileiras, que são apresentadas neste artigo. Integrar ensino e pesquisa, utilizando a face assistencial do sistema de saúde como um recurso pedagógico, evidencia-se como um objetivo aglutinador em vários países das Américas. Analisando-se as oito experiências apresentadas, observa-se que em seis delas a integração ensino, pesquisa e serviços já aparece como estratégia de formação e de educação permanente. Não obstante, a aproximação entre essas três funções persiste como um campo de disputas, de convergências e divergências, portanto, como espaço de conflitos entre distintos interesses, efetivando-se lentamente. Assim, novos investimentos precisam ser feitos no sentido de desvelar as dinâmicas e os processos em construção que facilitem e impulsionem a integração do ensino, da pesquisa e da assistência em saúde, que demandam práticas interprofissionais, interinstitucionais e intersetoriais, de forma a superar a crise de conhecimentos e de valores da saúde no mundo. This article aims to identify and analyze national and international experiences of integration in teaching, research and health services. From the experience in Municipal System of Health - School of Fortaleza, which integrates teaching, survey and assistance, interested us to know other experiences that take for granted such integration. In this sense, through a review of scientific literature, in bibliographic databases online, associated with a documentary research experiments that showed the same integration, we identified information indicating the existence of links between education, research and services. We selected eight experiments on the American continent, one in Canada, one in Cuba, two in Latin America and four in Brazil, which are presented in this article. Integrating teaching and research, using the face of the health system of care as an educational resource, it is clear as a unifying purpose in several countries of the Americas. Analyzing the 08 (eight) experiments presented, it is observed that in 06 (six) of them the integrate teaching, research and services already appears as a strategy for training and continuing education. However, the rapprochement between the functions of teaching, research and health services remains a battleground of convergence and divergence, therefore, as a space for conflict between different interests, making effective slowly. Thus, new investments must be made to uncover the dynamics and processes in construction to facilitate and foster the integration of teaching, research and health care, which requires inter practices, interagency and intersectoral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.496
GPT teacher head0.659
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHealth, Nursing, Elderly CareFrench-language works237,207