MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404709491 · doi:10.34119/bjhrv7n9-197

Impactos da transição alimentar na saúde bucal de crianças e adolescentes indígenas: uma revisão integrativa de literatura

2024· article· pt· W4404709491 on OpenAlexaff
Marivalda Pinto Figueira, Hélia Fernandes Saraiva, Tiago Silva da Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Health Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considerando a crescente influência da transição alimentar na saúde bucal de crianças e adolescentes indígenas, este estudo objetiva analisar seus impactos, identificando os principais fatores de risco e a relação entre o consumo de alimentos tradicionais e industrializados com a ocorrência de problemas bucais. Para tanto, realizou-se uma revisão integrativa da literatura, abrangendo estudos publicados entre 2004 e 2024. Os resultados evidenciaram a alta prevalência de cárie dentária associada à incorporação de alimentos industrializados na dieta, bem como a necessidade urgente de políticas públicas que considerem as particularidades culturais e sociais dessas populações, promovendo o acesso a serviços odontológicos e a educação em saúde bucal. Conclui-se que a transição alimentar representa um desafio significativo para a saúde bucal de crianças e adolescentes indígenas, demandando ações intersetoriais que valorizem os hábitos alimentares tradicionais e incentivem escolhas alimentares saudáveis, a fim de garantir o bem-estar integral dessas comunidades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Health ReviewSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207