Impact of Preventive Intravenous Amiodarone on Reperfusion Ventricular Fibrillation in Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a vicious arrhythmia usually generated after removal of the aortic cross-clamp (ACC) in patients undergoing open-heart surgery, which could damage cardiomyocytes, especially in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Amiodarone has the prominent properties of converting VF and restoring sinus rhythm. However, few studies concentrated on the effect of amiodarone before ACC release on reducing VF in patients with LVH. Objective: The study was designed to explore the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous amiodarone in reducing VF after the release of the ACC in patients with LVH. Methods: A total of 54 patients with LVH scheduled for open-heart surgery were enrolled and randomly divided (1:1) into 2 groups-group A (amiodarone group) and group P (placebo-controlled group). Thirty minutes before removal of the ACC, the trial drugs were administered intravenously. In group A, 150 mg of amiodarone was pumped in 15 minutes. In group P, the same volume of normal saline was pumped in 15 minutes. The primary outcome was the incidence of VF 10 minutes after removal of the ACC. Results: The incidence of VF was lower in group A than in group P (30% vs 70%, P=.003). The duration of VF, the number of defibrillations, and the defibrillation energy were also lower in group A than in group P (P<.001, P=.002, and P=.002, respectively). After the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, the heart rate and mean arterial pressure were lower in group A, and the mean pulmonary arterial pressure and the dose of vasoactive drugs were higher than those in group P (P<.001, P<.001, P=.04, and P=.02, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in the use of vasoactive-inotropic agents and hemodynamic status between the 2 groups before the end of surgery. Conclusions: In patients with LVH who undergo open-heart surgery, amiodarone can be safely used to reduce the incidence of VF, the duration of VF, the frequency of defibrillation, and the energy of defibrillation after ACC removal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".