MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404713053 · doi:10.3390/curroncol31120551

Spinal Metastases in Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Tumors: Prognosis and Integrated Therapeutic Approaches—A Systematic Review with an Institutional Case Illustration

2024· review· en· W4404713053 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gianluca Scalia, Gianluca Ferini, Zubayer Shams, Francesca Graziano, Giancarlo Ponzo, Eliana Giurato, Maria Grazia Galasso, Vitalinda Pumo, Martina Caruso, Gianluca Galvano, Salvatore Marrone, Jessica Naimo, Giovanni Federico Nicoletti, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTesticular cancerSpinal cord compressionGerm cell tumorsCauda equinaMalignancyMetastasectomyLaminectomyOncologyLumbarSurgeryCancerChemotherapyMetastasisSpinal cordInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(1) Background: Testicular cancer, although accounting for only 0.5% to 1% of all solid male cancers, is the most common malignancy in males aged 15 to 35 years. Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) represent nearly half of all testicular germ cell tumors and are associated with a more aggressive clinical course. Spinal metastases, while rare, pose significant challenges due to their potential to cause spinal cord compression, neurological deficits, and severe pain. This systematic review aims to evaluate prognosis and treatment approaches for spinal metastases in NSGCT, with a focus on multidisciplinary care and treatment outcomes. (2) Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched on 18 September 2024, using the Boolean search strategy [(Nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) AND (spinal OR vertebral metastases)]. Case reports, case series, and cohort studies providing detailed patient data were included. Data on patient demographics, tumor histology, metastatic site, treatments, and outcomes were extracted for analysis. (3) Results: A total of 164 cases of NSGCT with spinal metastases were analyzed, with patients aged 23 to 40 years (median: 31.5 years). The lumbar spine was involved in all cases, and spinal cord compression occurred in 59.8% of patients, often causing severe neurological symptoms such as cauda equina syndrome. Chemotherapy, primarily cisplatin-based, was administered in all cases, while surgical interventions, including laminectomy and vertebrectomy, were performed in cases of spinal compression and instability. Complete remission occurred in only 2.4% of patients. Progressive improvement was observed in 56.7% of cases, while 20.1% of patients died. Outcomes varied, highlighting the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary care to manage both systemic and localized disease. (4) Conclusions: Spinal metastases in NSGCT represent a complex clinical scenario, requiring a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and in some cases, radiotherapy. Chemotherapy remains essential, but surgery is critical for addressing spinal compression and instability. A multidisciplinary approach is vital for optimizing outcomes, as prognosis is variable, with some patients achieving improvement while others face progressive disease or death. Further research is needed to refine the role of radiotherapy and improve long-term treatment strategies for this rare complication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→