MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement and Modeling of Viscous Oil and Tar Mat Formation with a Single, Low-maturity Charge

2024· article· en· W4404717363 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver C. Mullins, Tarek S. Mohamed, Morten Kristensen, Shu Pan, Kang Wang, I. Yücel Akkutlu, Carlos Torres‐Verdín

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)Charge (physics)tar (computing)Environmental scienceChemistryPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceMineralogyGeologyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tar mats are common features in carbonate and sandstone petroleum reservoirs in many basins throughout the world and greatly reduce fluid flow through affected rock. They are comprised in part by a solid or very viscous carbonaceous organic phase deposited in the rock pore spaces and in fractures and frequently found at the bottom of the reservoirs at the oil–water contact (OWC). Tar mats can be thin or quite thick (e.g., 10 m thick) and can be patchy or laterally continuous across the entire OWC of a reservoir. Tar mats and possible associated viscous oil have a huge impact on pressure support and aquifer sweep during oil production. In spite of their importance, two key properties of tar mats have not been explained in the literature: (1) the mechanism of their formation and (2) why tar mats are at the base of the reservoir. In this article, these two questions are resolved; the predominant mechanisms of formation of a tar mat and viscous oil column is clarified for a large reservoir representative of a simple class of reservoirs; those with a single low maturity charge, and with no alteration processes such as biodegradation. Here, extensive chemical analysis of the tar and viscous oil is reviewed constraining possible explanations for the origin of the tar mat. The formation of the tar mat and viscous oil is demonstrated numerically using reservoir flow simulation (Eclipse) using 2D model simulations. First-principles fluid mechanics considerations support simulation models. The nanocolloidal characterization of asphaltenes in oil codified by the Yen–Mullins model is key to predicting viscous oil and tar mat distributions at the 100 km length scale. Boycott convection is responsible for transport of asphaltene gravity currents across reservoir length scales. In addition, the role of Boycott convection in inhibiting tar mat formation clarifies why tar mats are generally form only after the reservoir charge is complete, and thus found at or near the OWC. With the understanding and modeling of this “simple” process of viscous oil and tar mat formation, more complex processes such as those involving multiple, incompatible charges are now readily accessible to reservoir simulation and for forecasting production especially with water injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207