MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404720499 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117382

Pesticide presence in stream water, suspended sediment and biofilm is strongly linked to upstream catchment land use and crop type

2024· article· en· W4404720499 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Moira M. Ijzerman, Melanie Raby, Nick V Letwin, Tyler Black, Yaryna M. Kudla, Rebecca K Osborne, Paul K. Sibley, Ryan S. Prosser

Bibliographic record

VenueEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSedimentPesticideDrainage basinHydrology (agriculture)Land useEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringAgronomyEcologyBiologyChemistryGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pesticide pollution can present high ecological risks to aquatic ecosystems. Small streams are particularly susceptible. There is a need for reproducible and readily available methods to identify aquatic regions at risk of pesticide contamination. There is currently a limited understanding of the relationship between upstream catchment land use and the presence of pesticides in multiple aquatic matrices. The aim of this study was to develop empirical relationships between different land uses and the levels of pesticides detected in multiple aquatic matrices. The inclusion of biofilm and suspended sediment as monitoring matrices has recently been proven effective for the characterization of pesticide exposure in stream ecosystems. Ten streams in Ontario, Canada with a variety of upstream catchment land uses were sampled in 2021 and 2022. Water, suspended sediment and biofilm were collected and analyzed from each site for the presence of approximately 500 different pesticides. Each of the three matrices exhibited distinctive pesticide exposure profiles. We found a significant relationship between the percentage of agriculture and urban land use and the detection of multiple pesticides in water, sediment and biofilm (logistic regressions, P<0.05). Statistically significant probabilistic models capable of predicting pesticide detections based on upstream catchment land use were developed. High-resolution cover crop maps identified soybeans, corn and other agriculture (e.g., vegetables, berries, canola) as the key variables associated with individual pesticide detection frequencies in each of the three matrices (linear regressions, P<0.05). Soybean land use was also the strongest predictor of site-wide pesticide pollution. This modelling approach using upstream catchment land use variables has the potential to be a powerful tool to identify streams at risk of pesticide pollution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcotoxicology and Environmental SafetySame topicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207