Exploring the Impact of Image-Based Audio Representations in Classification Tasks Using Vision Transformers and Explainable AI Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important hurdle in medical diagnostics is the high-quality and interpretable classification of audio signals. In this study, we present an image-based representation of infant crying audio files to predict abnormal infant cries using a vision transformer and also show significant improvements in the performance and interpretability of this computer-aided tool. The use of advanced feature extraction techniques such as Gammatone Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (GFCCs) resulted in a classification accuracy of 96.33%. For other features (spectrogram and mel-spectrogram), the performance was very similar, with an accuracy of 93.17% for the spectrogram and 94.83% accuracy for the mel-spectrogram. We used our vision transformer (ViT) model, which is less complex but more effective than the proposed audio spectrogram transformer (AST). We incorporated explainable AI (XAI) techniques such as Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and attention mechanisms to ensure transparency and reliability in decision-making, which helped us understand the why of model predictions. The accuracy of detection was higher than previously reported and the results were easy to interpret, demonstrating that this work can potentially serve as a new benchmark for audio classification tasks, especially in medical diagnostics, and providing better prospects for an imminent future of trustworthy AI-based healthcare solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".