Novel Immunohistochemical Profiling of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Correlations Between Tumor Subtypes and Immune Microenvironment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with an emerging molecular classification based on the expression of the transcription factors ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3. This study aimed to explore the relationship between these novel subtypes and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), particularly CD8+ and CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Methods: In 51 cases of patients with SCLC, immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, CD56, Ki67, CD8, and CD4 were performed. H-scores for the novel transcription factors were calculated to determine tumor subtype. CD8+ and CD4+ TIL counts were averaged across 10 high-power fields. The Kruskal–Wallis test and subsequent post hoc Dunn tests were used to determine the differences in transcription factor expression and TILs across subtypes. Results: In our cohort, 68.62% of our cases were SCLC-A, 9.80% were SCLC-N, 7.84% were SCLC-P, and 13.72% were SCLC-I. Significant differences were observed in the expression of ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3 across subtypes. CD8+ TILs were more abundant in SCLC-P and SCLC-I. CD8+ TILs were negatively correlated with ASCL1 expression (p < 0.05) and positively correlated with POU2F3 expression (p < 0.005). Conclusions: This study highlights the need to integrate the novel SCLC classification with data regarding the TIME to better inform patient prognosis and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".