MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404728081 · doi:10.1002/bimj.202300214

A Semiparametric Two‐Sample Density Ratio Model With a Change Point

2024· article· en· W4404728081 on OpenAlex
Jiahui Feng, Kin Yau Wong, Chun Yin Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiometrical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceHong Kong Polytechnic University
KeywordsCovariateStatisticsLogistic regressionMathematicsEquivalence (formal languages)InferenceBinary dataSample size determinationEconometricsDensity estimationBinary numberEstimatorComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The logistic regression model for a binary outcome with a continuous covariate can be expressed equivalently as a two-sample density ratio model for the covariate. Utilizing this equivalence, we study a change-point logistic regression model within the corresponding density ratio modeling framework. We investigate estimation and inference methods for the density ratio model and develop maximal score-type tests to detect the presence of a change point. In contrast to existing work, the density ratio modeling framework facilitates the development of a natural Kolmogorov-Smirnov type test to assess the validity of the logistic model assumptions. A simulation study is conducted to evaluate the finite-sample performance of the proposed tests and estimation methods. We illustrate the proposed approach using a mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission data set and an oral cancer data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.240
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it