MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404729345 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-znh0f

Accelerated development of gas diffusion electrodes for CO2 electrolyzers

2024· preprint· en· W4404729345 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhishek Soni, Siwei Ma, Karry Ocean, Kevan E. Dettelbach, Daniel Lin, Connor Rupnow, Mehrdad Mokhtari, Christopher E. B. Waizenegger, Giuseppe V. Crescenzo, Curtis P. Berlinguette

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsDiffusionGaseous diffusionElectrodeDevelopment (topology)Materials scienceChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsPhysical chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we present a high-throughput flexible automation system, AdaCarbon, to accelerate the development of gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) for CO2 electrolysis. AdaCarbon consists of a team of seven robots with automated modules for GDE fabrication and characterization and an automated test cell (ATC) that performs zero-gap CO2 electrolysis. We use this platform to fabricate and test 90 GDEs (30 unique GDEs in triplicate) with varied compositions of Cu-Ag metal and Nafion-Sustainion ionomer bilayers with the goal of increasing the yield of ethylene produced at the current density of 200 mA cm–2. We show GDEs with higher Cu and Nafion ionomer content increased ethylene selectivity 5 to 9%. We also demonstrate that AdaCarbon accelerates the workflow for making and testing GDEs by a factor of three compared to a manual workflow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxiv→Same topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts→French-language works237,207→