Functional Dichotomy of Orbitofrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex Subregions in Decision-Making and Brain-Body Regulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mood disorders are associated with complex disruptions in brain networks, including those associated with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC). The functional contribution of the caudal OFC (cOFC) has remained largely unexplored. We investigated the functions of the cOFC and pACC in macaques performing an approach-avoidance task by the combination of multimodal recordings and electrical microstimulation (EMS) of the cOFC. We assessed neural, autonomic and behavioral responses. We found the cOFC to be sensitive to both positive and negative stimuli, whereas the pACC was singificantly more active during aversive outcomes. EMS of the cOFC increased avoidance behavior, suggesting a causal role for the OFC subdivision in cost-benefit decision-making. Physiological measurements were positively correlated with behavioral patterns, emphasizing body-brain synchronization during emotionally significant decision-making. We suggest that the cOFC contributes to inducing pessimistic states, thereby making its dysfunction a potential contributor to the etiology of mood disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".