Global Banking Regulations and Performance: A Study of Basel III Implementation in Developing and Developed Nations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the impact of Basel III regulations on bank performance in both developing and developed countries. A stable financial system is recognized as a key driver of economic growth, with banks playing a central role in facilitating technological advancements and economic development. However, advancements in global banking, alongside financial crises such as the 2007-08 global downturn, have highlighted the need for robust risk management frameworks. The Basel norms, particularly Basel III, were introduced to strengthen capital requirements, liquidity buffers, and supervisory processes to mitigate systemic risks. This research compares the effects of Basel III on banks in five developing countries (Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand) and five developed countries (Canada, France, Germany, the UK, USA), focusing on changes in efficiency and productivity. By examining these countries' progress in Basel III implementation, the study offers valuable insights into how global banking regulations impact bank performance, highlighting differences across economic contexts and contributing to a deeper understanding of financial sector stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".